How a Startup Could Avoid SEC Scrutiny With Strong Compliance Strategies

HodlX Guest Post  Submit Your Post

Do you know that one misstep from a Web 3.0 founder could bring the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) knocking at the doorstep of the company unannounced?

This has been the fate of reputable projects like Ripple, Block.one and so on. Their regulatory missteps have turned into multi-million-dollar headaches for years now.

Let’s take Ripple as a case study. Over the years, the SEC sued Ripple, claiming that XRP was an unregistered security – this has led to lengthy battles.

Consequently, this prolonged battle had a huge impact on XRP market value, and holders experienced a significant loss.

According to this source, after Ripple was granted a partial victory through summary judgments, CEO Brad Garlinghouse said the company has spent over $150 million on its defense.

Thus, while there is no perfect approach to staying off the SEC’s radar, especially if you’re founding a solution-driven project. Here is a guide that can arm you with the right compliance strategies to stay off their radar.

SEC scrutiny and the regulatory nature of the blockchain startup

A lot has happened in recent years with the SEC asserting itself over many projects falling short of its standards.

For new companies emanating in the Web 3.0 space, knowing how to build on a compliant basis from day one is no doubt paramount to their survival.

Yes, SEC scrutiny might delay a launch, freeze assets or give rise to enforcement actions, but the basic aim of this article is to give a legal-strategic guide to the founders of Web 3.0 projects that wish to identify possible risks tied to the SEC, approach compliance from a proactive standpoint and build up their projects for the long haul.

This guide is a sort of seasoned lawyer’s toolkit for compliance without stifling innovation.

1. Understand the SEC’s role in Web 3.0 regulation

This is one of the surest ways to avoid SEC scrutiny. Technically, the SEC is charged with protecting investors and maintaining fair, orderly markets.

While their interest isn’t limited to ICOs (initial coin offerings) – it extends to DeFi (decentralized finance) protocols, staking mechanisms, NFT (non-fungible token) projects, token-based fundraising and more.

One of the common mistakes startup founders make is thinking that decentralization exempts them from scrutiny.

According to this source, SEC has increased their dogged vigilance in holding projects accountable, even retroactively.

Crypto startup owners must understand that regulators view blockchain through a risk-focused lens, and they prioritize consumer protection over the innovation you’re bringing in.

Furthermore, founders have to align operational frameworks with regulatory expectations from inception.

Startups that anticipate and respond to the SEC’s evolving stance gain credibility not just with regulators but with investors and users alike.

Also, when founders understand the regulators’ triggers and intentions, they can conceive products and ecosystems that innovate within the legal guardrails.

2. The Howey test and token classification – The SEC’s primary lens

Once a project structurally passes the Howey test, it has passed the first compliance checkpoint.

This test is not just central to SEC enforcement – it’s their primary lens that determines whether a digital asset qualifies as a security.

What is a Howey test? It is simply analyzed as an investment of money in a common enterprise with a reasonable expectation of profits to be derived from the efforts of others.

Here are the four-pronged Howey test questions to be asked.

• Is there any investment of money?
• Is it a common enterprise?
• Is there an expectation of profits?
• Is it derived from the efforts of others?

If the answer is ‘yes’ to all four, the asset is perceived as a ‘security’ and subject to SEC rules.

For years now, many tokens have been sold with speculative promise. To avoid such scrutiny, founders must carefully structure their tokenomics.

While this act may include removing profit expectations, decentralizing control and delaying token issuance until the network is sufficiently mature, legal memos and third-party assessments can help support the non-security classification.

One of the SEC’s rules has emphasized that simply calling a token a ‘utility’ doesn’t exempt it from being a security.

The Howey test is functional, and a rigorous application of it that is backed by legal counsel and documentation is the first line of defense in controlling regulatory risk and avoiding unwanted SEC attention.

3. Smart structuring from day one – Entity formation and jurisdiction

One of the smartest ways to avoid SEC scrutiny is to engage in smart structuring from the beginning. How a startup incorporates and where it operates can significantly impact its regulatory exposure.

For instance, US-based startups fall directly under the SEC’s oversight, so selecting the right entity type (LLC, C-Corp, Foundation) and jurisdiction is very strategic.

While offshore jurisdictions like the Cayman Islands or Switzerland may offer more favorable regulatory environments for token-based projects, it doesn’t absolve the startup completely from US law if their citizens’ investments are involved.

More so, a project with dual-entity structure – for example, a dual between the US C-Corp for operations and an offshore foundation for protocol governance – can offer balance, but it must be supported by robust governance, crystal clear roles and arms-length dealings.

Early legal counsel is critical here because any missteps in entity setup can jeopardize the startup in multi-jurisdictional legal issues that are very costly and time-consuming to resolve.

Blockchain birthed decentralization, and decentralization eradicates excessive protocol from the development team.

But for it not to be an SEC meal ticket, it must be handled with legal precision to avoid scrutiny. The end goal is to align the structure with the project’s operational goals and compliance needs.

4. Regulatory-first tokenomics design

No matter how great your Web 3.0 project ideas are, if you toil with your tokenomics, you’re giving the SEC an open invitation.

Startups must think beyond utility and value capture to consider how their token models may be perceived under securities laws.

Avoiding profit promises is essential.

For example, it’s much safer to design structures for tokens to be earned through network participation or staking instead of speculative promises that entice people to participate during pre-launch.

By doing this, you’re reducing legal exposure. More so, vesting schedules for team and investor tokens should be transparent and defensible.

The more a token ecosystem is decentralized at launch, the lower the risk. Airdrops and ‘fair launches’ are also under scrutiny if tied to promotional schemes or disguised fundraising.

Any Web 3.0 startup that embeds compliance in tokenomics has not only de-risked its operations but has also gained investor confidence by showing that its model can withstand regulatory due diligence.

5. Implementing an education compliance program

Education is a powerful key and leveraging it can help Web 3.0 founders to avoid the SEC’s strong scrutiny.

By ensuring that your team members understand compliance obligations, you can prevent inadvertent violations.

When your team members are armed with the necessary knowledge, like periodic audits and internal legal reviews, how they consult with outside counsel will help smooth your project processes and avoid violations.

Meanwhile, it’s also wise to engage with regulators when appropriate, for instance, you could submit no-action letters or seek interpretative guidance.

A startup that shows proactive compliance is more likely to receive regulatory cooperation than a sanction.

6. Build a compliance shield – KYC/AML as a non-negotiable pillar

While decentralization is a core value of Web 3.0, KYC (know your customer) and AML (anti-money laundering) protocols are non-negotiable from a regulatory perspective.

The SEC, along with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), expects any entity engaged in token sales or exchanges to implement KYC/AML safeguards.

Failure to do so not only attracts scrutiny but can invite criminal liability.

Blockchain startups must integrate identity verification processes for investors and users – particularly during token distributions, fundraising or when providing financial-like services.

Tools like Chainalysis or TRM Labs can also help monitor on-chain behavior for suspicious activity. Privacy does not mean anonymity in the eyes of regulators – it means responsible data management.

Even decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) that facilitate economic activity must consider KYC obligations, depending on their functions.

Embedding these checks from day one allows your project to scale lawfully. Moreover, demonstrating AML/KYC readiness opens up institutional partnerships and fiat on-ramp opportunities.

In a maturing market, clean compliance can be more valuable than fast growth.

7. Understand how to navigate fundraising – From reg D to reg CF

Do you know how to navigate fundraising without raising eyebrows?

Whether it’s token sales, SAFEs (Simple Agreements for Future Equity) or even NFT-based fundraising, to avoid pitfalls, Web 3.0 founders must align their fundraising approach with one of the SEC’s recognized exemptions.

One of these is Regulation D (Reg D). It allows private offerings to accredited investors without full SEC registration.

It’s commonly used during token presales but requires proper filings (Form D) and marketing restrictions.

Another is Regulation CF (Regulation Crowdfunding). It offers a path for raising from the general public, up to $5 million annually, with lower compliance burdens than IPOs.

It still mandates disclosures, investor limits and platform usage.

In order not to trigger SEC scrutiny, you must avoid these death traps, and they are as follows: misrepresenting the offering, failing to file accordingly and overselling tokens.

More so, ensure your legal counsel is fully involved when structuring these rounds and drafting appropriate documentation.

Smart fundraising isn’t just about capital – it’s about regulatory sustainability.

8. Staying ahead, constant monitoring and having an experienced legal counsel

The path to success is not just paved with code and capital – it’s fortified with legal foresight. Hiring and retaining experienced legal counsel is not a luxury but a necessity.

After my recent LinkedIn interview with Yarden Noy, blockchain legal and regulatory advisor at DTL Law, on the basic requirements of hiring a seasoned blockchain lawyer or advisor, here is his feedback.

Noy said,

“It’s not enough to simply know the law in this industry.

“A seasoned blockchain lawyer should be able to analyze the unique model and features of a project, identify the relevant laws that apply or may apply to it and apply them in this constantly evolving and dynamic landscape.

“And all of that must be in a way that facilitates the project’s growth – not stifling it.

“Lawyers in this nuanced space need to have a good understanding not only of the law but also of the technology, the industry and the Web 3.0 community.

“Even the best legal advice, when not coupled with an understanding of the unique features of the crypto world, would be of little to no use for a crypto entrepreneur.”

Your legal advisor should not be left out on tactical activities like periodic legal reviews, audits and compliance updates that surround the legal boundaries of your project.

Furthermore, as the SEC continues to evolve its posture on blockchain regulation, Web 3.0 startups must adapt continuously to match the changes in global regulatory frameworks.

Startups must maintain internal communication channels for discussing compliance updates, ensuring all stakeholders – from developers to marketers – act in sync.

The goal is not just to avoid enforcement but to build a business that can grow confidently under regulatory clarity.

In conclusion, if you’re a founder pregnant with a revolutionary Web 3.0 idea, build boldly and legally – compliance isn’t a burden.

Ejiofor Francis is a seasoned technology writer with over six years of experience. His current focus is on finance, blockchain, Al and tech matters. He loves helping both startups and mid-sized companies to develop great SEO content and marketing strategies that set them on the right track.

Generated Image: Midjourney

The post How a Startup Could Avoid SEC Scrutiny With Strong Compliance Strategies appeared first on The Daily Hodl.